Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6447770 | Engineering Geology | 2015 | 33 Pages |
Abstract
ALERT successfully identified groundwater level changes during both monitoring scenarios. It provided a more useful indication of the rate of water level rise and maximum water levels than piezometer monitoring results. This was due to the piezometers rapidly responding to pressure changes at depth, whilst ALERT/DGC provided information of slower changes associated with the storage and delayed drainage of water within the sediment. By applying DGC we were able to automatically and quantitatively define changes in the resistivity sections, which correlated well with the direct observations of groundwater at site. For ERT monitoring applications that generate numerous time series, the use of DGC could significantly enhance the efficiency of data interpretation, and provide a means of automating groundwater monitoring through assigning alarm thresholds associated with rapid changes in groundwater conditions.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Authors
J.E. Chambers, P.I. Meldrum, P.B. Wilkinson, W. Ward, C. Jackson, B. Matthews, P. Joel, O. Kuras, L. Bai, S. Uhlemann, D. Gunn,