Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6463298 Science & Justice 2017 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

•First descriptive and qualitative account of ballistic analyses in Europe•Inconsistencies in ballistic data recording practices and definitions•Need for an agreed standard protocol for best practice•Fragmented picture of ballistic analysis and lack of system interoperability

The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.

Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemistry Analytical Chemistry
Authors
, , , , , , ,