Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6463298 | Science & Justice | 2017 | 10 Pages |
â¢First descriptive and qualitative account of ballistic analyses in Europeâ¢Inconsistencies in ballistic data recording practices and definitionsâ¢Need for an agreed standard protocol for best practiceâ¢Fragmented picture of ballistic analysis and lack of system interoperability
The current study explored the use of ballistic examinations and cross-border information sharing across 14 European countries. The presented data were collected using a mixed methods technique consisting of semi-structured interviews and questionnaires that were completed by participants. The results painted a very heterogeneous picture of the use of automated ballistic systems across these countries, as well as how ballistic analyses are integrated in the fight against gun-enabled crime. Three super-ordinates themes emerged from the thematic analysis: use of automated ballistic systems; Ballistic evidence recovery and analysis; knowledge exchange and best practices. The ability to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of ballistics comparison systems, either on a national or cross-border basis, is hampered by inconsistencies regarding data recording practices and definitions. Therefore, key recommendations are suggested to establish better cross border cooperation between member states and develop a better understanding of data sharing procedures.