Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6475896 | Fuel | 2017 | 16 Pages |
â¢The study follows up a previous study on isothermal sprays produced with the same nozzles and fuels.â¢Simultaneous liquid and vapor phase visualizations are carried out with different techniques.â¢The effect of nozzle geometry is analyzed for three different fuels along a wide test matrix.â¢144 test conditions are evaluated in the high temperature/high pressure test rig.
The influence of internal nozzle flow characteristics over the evaporative spray development is studied experimentally for two different nozzle geometries and three different fuels. This is a continuation of previous work by the authors where non-evaporative isothermal spray development was studied experimentally for the same nozzle geometries and fuels. Current study reports macroscopic spray characteristics by imaging the liquid and vapor phases of the spray simultaneously using independent cameras and optical techniques. The liquid phase is captured by a fast-pulsed diffused back illumination setup, while the vapor phase is captured by a single-pass Schlieren setup with diaphragm. The nozzle geometries consist of a conical nozzle and a cylindrical nozzle with 8.6% larger outlet diameter when compared to the conical nozzle. Among the three fuels, two are pure components-n-heptane and n-dodecane-while the third consists of a three-component surrogate to better represent the physical and chemical properties of diesel fuel. For a fixed ambient density, the liquid penetration is controlled by ambient temperature while the vapor penetration is controlled by injection pressure. The cylindrical nozzle, in spite of higher mass flow rate and momentum flux, shows slower vapor spray tip penetration when compared to the conical nozzle. Also, the cylindrical nozzle consistently produced shorter liquid lengths. The vapor spray spreading angle is found to be inversely proportional to the spray tip penetration, largely influenced by the nozzle geometry and the ambient density. n-Heptane spray shows the shortest liquid lengths, followed by n-dodecane and finally the Surrogate. No significant difference in vapor penetration rates was found between fuels, confirming that the vapor spray is controlled by momentum, which is independent of fuel. This was not the case for the non-evaporative isothermal sprays previously studied by the authors. Liquid lengths show the expected responses to parametric variations of ambient temperature and density. Two empirical predictive models are presented and utilized to analyze the influence of fuel properties on the liquid length. The primary factor controlling the liquid length between fuels is found to be their volatility. Finally, the cylindrical nozzle exhibits larger line-of-sight contour fluctuations in both the liquid and vapor phases, which in turn contributes to the shorter liquid lengths and slower vapor penetration.