Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6537000 | Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2016 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
The results showed differences in simulated yields among crop models but all models reproduced well the pattern of the stratification. Importantly, the regional mean of simulated yields based on full coverage could already be reproduced by a small sample of 10 points. This was also true for reproducing the temporal variability in simulated yields but more sampling points (about 100) were required to accurately reproduce spatial yield variability. The number of sampling points can be smaller when a stratified sampling is applied as compared to a random sampling. However, differences between crop models were observed including some interaction between the effect of sampling on simulated yields and the model used. We concluded that stratified sampling can considerably reduce the number of required simulations. But, differences between crop models must be considered as the choice for a specific model can have larger effects on simulated yields than the sampling strategy. Assessing the impact of sampling soil and crop management data for regional simulations of crop yields is still needed.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Atmospheric Science
Authors
Lenny G.J. van Bussel, Frank Ewert, Gang Zhao, Holger Hoffmann, Andreas Enders, Daniel Wallach, Senthold Asseng, Guillermo A. Baigorria, Bruno Basso, Christian Biernath, Davide Cammarano, James Chryssanthacopoulos, Julie Constantin, Joshua Elliott,