Toolmark variability and quality depending on the fundamental parameters: Angle of attack, toolmark depth and substrate material

The results show that for known matching toolmarks, the variability is very low within a toolmark and between toolmarks in wax, given that the parameters angle of attack and depth are held constant. Geometrical details are reliably represented down to 10-50 μm and toolmark similarity is clearly higher than known non-matching similarities. The comparison of wax and lead shows that wax is a good alternative as a substrate material for experimental toolmarks, capable of reliably representing structural details down to 10-25 μm. For finer details, lead is a better choice but might alter the original state of a tool. With increasing angle of attack, toolmark variability increases and toolmark quality decreases. Therefore it is advantageous to push the tool instead of pulling during toolmark creation for angles of attack above ≈45°. The quality also decreases with increasing toolmark depth, but only up to ≈300 μm. Therefore toolmarks should be created as shallow as possible in the substrate material.