Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6552350 | Forensic Science International | 2014 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Following that, classification and prediction of future samples were evaluated by means of supervised techniques of classification such as linear/quadratic discriminant analysis (LDA/QDA), support vector machines (SVM), soft independent modeling of classes analogies (SIMCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). SIMCA was the preferred method, as it provided the smallest false negative rates together with a correct classification rate of about 95%. From an investigative point-of-view the presence of false positives was considered acceptable, as it is preferable to have a longer list of possible sources but have confidence that the true source belongs to it.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry
Authors
Cyril Muehlethaler, Geneviève Massonnet, Pierre Esseiva,