Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6557673 | Energy Research & Social Science | 2018 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Clayton Christensen's term, 'disruptive innovation' has become widespread. Unfortunately, Christensen's theory relies on far too narrow a conception of both disruption and innovation to be a central framework for thinking about low-carbon transitions. It is better understood as describing one specific mechanism of technological and industrial change that contributes to a broader framework of understanding transitions. It should also be understood as a warning and reminder: businesses, policy analysts and energy modellers alike are prone to overlook potential shifts in user demands, and the technological changes that chase and enable them.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy (General)
Authors
Will McDowall,