| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 662395 | International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer | 2005 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
In the concerned paper, tube dimensions have been taken from the experimental set-up drawings. Recently, during Wilson plot calibration tests, after extension of the operating range of the set-up, came to light that the tube sizes used were slightly different from what was stated in the drawings. Consequently, published experimental fluidized bed heat transfer coefficients are up to 40% too low and some conclusions had to be adapted. The new, correct experimental heat transfer results show a much better agreement with heat transfer models in literature. The authors of the subjected paper deeply regret the errors. Corrected versions of Sections 4 and 5 of the paper are presented here.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Authors
P. Pronk, J.W. Meewisse, C.A. Infante Ferreira,
![First Page Preview: Erratum to “Validation of the use of heat transfer models in liquid/solid fluidized beds for ice slurry generation” [International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 46 (2003) 3683–3695] Erratum to “Validation of the use of heat transfer models in liquid/solid fluidized beds for ice slurry generation” [International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 46 (2003) 3683–3695]](/preview/png/662395.png)