Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
667607 International Journal of Multiphase Flow 2007 30 Pages PDF
Abstract

A flow-pattern-dependent model, traditionally used for calculation of pressure drop and water hold-up, is accustomed for calculation of the liquid production rates in oil–water horizontal flow, based on the known pressure drop and water hold-up. The area-averaged steady-state one-dimensional two-fluid model is used for stratified flow, while the homogeneous model is employed for dispersed flow. The prediction errors appear to be larger when the production rates are calculated instead of pressure drop and water hold-up. The difference in the calculation accuracies between the direct and inverse calculation is most probably caused by the different uncertainties in the measured values of the input variables and a high sensitivity of the calculated phase flow-rates on even small change of the water hold-up for certain flow regimes. In order to locate the source of error in the standard two-fluid model formulation, several parametric studies are performed. In the first parametric study, we investigate under which conditions the momentum equations are satisfied when the measured pressure drop and water hold-up are imposed. The second and third parametric studies address the influence of the interfacial waves and drop entrainment on the model accuracy, respectively. These studies show that both interfacial waves and drop entrainment can be responsible for the augmentation of the wall-shear stress in oil–water flow. In addition, consideration of the interfacial waves offers an explanation for some important phenomena of the oil–water flow, such as the wall-shear stress reduction.

Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Authors
, ,