Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6679407 Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 2009 8 Pages PDF
Abstract
The comparison of the measurements to MPFR-CHEMKIN II simulations with different mechanisms shows that the predictions of all tested mechanisms with the exception of the GRI3.0 agree well with the experimental values for reference gas, 40% hydrogen/60% reference gas and partly for 80% hydrogen/20% reference gas and 100% hydrogen. None of the mechanisms can represent the observed reduction of the activation energy at low temperatures of pure hydrogen and of 80% hydrogen/20% reference gas at p ⩾ 4 bar. The literature mechanisms which were developed for H2 or for mixtures with a dominating H2 subsystem cannot predict the observed reduction of the activation energies, either.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering (General)
Authors
, ,