Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6679407 | Proceedings of the Combustion Institute | 2009 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
The comparison of the measurements to MPFR-CHEMKIN II simulations with different mechanisms shows that the predictions of all tested mechanisms with the exception of the GRI3.0 agree well with the experimental values for reference gas, 40% hydrogen/60% reference gas and partly for 80% hydrogen/20% reference gas and 100% hydrogen. None of the mechanisms can represent the observed reduction of the activation energy at low temperatures of pure hydrogen and of 80% hydrogen/20% reference gas at p ⩾ 4 bar. The literature mechanisms which were developed for H2 or for mixtures with a dominating H2 subsystem cannot predict the observed reduction of the activation energies, either.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Chemical Engineering (General)
Authors
J. Herzler, C. Naumann,