Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6732541 | Energy and Buildings | 2015 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
In this paper, an assessment is made of the cost/benefit ratio associated to two different strategies for intervention on a 40 year old detached single house in Portugal: total demolition vs. refurbishment. Since the building cost of both strategies of intervention was estimated to be similar, environmental impact was considered as a decision criteria. Therefore, an analysis was made of the initial embodied energy, new materials and materials sent to landfill, for two different scenarios: (a) integral substitution of the existing structure by a new house, and (b) partial demolition and refurbishment of existing house. The original house was characterized to provide a benchmark for the comparison of both intervention strategies. In the end, data related to energy and mass were used to sustain a decision regarding the recommended type of intervention.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Authors
Pedro Lima Gaspar, António Lobato Santos,