Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6735609 | Engineering Structures | 2018 | 18 Pages |
Abstract
The evaluation of EFM and FEM is derived from a comparative simulation of a two-storey URM wall experimentally tested by other researchers. Two alternative approaches are assumed for the definition of piers' effective heights in the EFM, i.e. the models proposed by Dolce [1] and Augenti [2]. The results demonstrate that remarkable differences may be detected in EFM and FEM predictions of the shear capacity and damage mechanisms as a function of pier-spandrel geometrical configurations. This result highlights the need for a cautious application of EFM to existing URM structures.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Authors
Rossella Siano, Pere Roca, Guido Camata, Luca Pelà , Vincenzo Sepe, Enrico Spacone, Massimo Petracca,