Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6760609 | Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2015 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Two different CFD models are constructed: the first is a single-phase steady model prepared in ANSYS Fluent, while the second is a two-phase model based on the volume of fluid (VOF) method in STARCCM+ to capture the upper free-surface dynamics. Both use a Lagrangian tracking approach with oneway coupling to follow the particles throughout the reactor. The system code SIMMER-IV is used for the third model, without neutronic coupling. Although limited regarding the fluid dynamic aspects compared to the CFD codes, comparisons of particle distributions highlight strong similarities despite quantitative discrepancies in the size of fuel accumulations. These disparities should be taken into account while performing the safety analysis of nuclear systems and developing strategies for accident mitigation.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Authors
Sophia Buckingham, Philippe Planquart, Marica Eboli, Vincent Moreau, Katrien Van Tichelen,