| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6760610 | Nuclear Engineering and Design | 2015 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
In addition, the fuel cycle costs of OT (Once-Through) and Pyro-SFR recycling based on the most likely value using a probabilistic cost estimation except for reactor costs were calculated to be 8.75 mills/kWÂ h and 8.30 mills/kWÂ h, respectively. Namely, the Pyro-SFR recycling option was more economical than the direct disposal option. However, if the reactor cost is considered, the economic sense in the generation cost between the two options (direct disposal vs. Pyro-SFR recycling) can be changed because of the high reactor cost of an SFR.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Authors
Sungki Kim, Wonil Ko, Saerom Youn, Ruxing Gao, Sungsig Bang,