Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6793409 | Evaluation and Program Planning | 2015 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
This research explores the relationship between participation in evaluation and the use of evaluation findings and processes within three large-scale multi-site evaluations. Using canonical correlation analysis and a collection of 20 interviews, this study describes and tests the relationship between these two critical conceptual powerhouses in evaluation. Using data that were collected as a part of the NSF-funded research Beyond Evaluation Use (Lawrenz & King, 2009), this study found that some theories and beliefs about participatory evaluation contribute to use and influence in similar ways as in single-site evaluations. The differences identified in this research highlight potential planning and implementation considerations that might allow multi-site evaluators and funders of multi-site evaluation to enhance use and influence of multi-site evaluations.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Denise Roseland, Frances Lawrenz, Mao Thao,