| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 681702 | Bioresource Technology | 2011 | 9 Pages |
Ionic liquid (IL) and ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreatments were studied to develop the first direct side-by-side comparative assessment on their respective impacts on biomass structure, composition, process mass balance, and enzymatic saccharification efficiency. AFEX pretreatment completely preserves plant carbohydrates, whereas IL pretreatment extracts 76% of hemicellulose. In contrast to AFEX, the native crystal structure of the recovered corn stover from IL pretreatment was significantly disrupted. For both techniques, more than 70% of the theoretical sugar yield was attained after 48 h of hydrolysis using commercial enzyme cocktails. IL pretreatment requires less enzyme loading and a shorter hydrolysis time to reach 90% yields. Hemicellulase addition led to significant improvements in the yields of glucose and xylose for AFEX pretreated corn stover, but not for IL pretreated stover. These results provide new insights into the mechanisms of IL and AFEX pretreatment, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each.
► The first side-by-side comparison of ionic liquid (IL) and ammonia fiber expansion pretreatment (AFEX) on the same biomass. ► AFEX pretreatment completely preserves plant carbohydrates, but IL removes 76% hemicellulose and 84% lignin. ► The native crystal structure of IL pretreated biomass is highly disrupted with increased surface area and porosity. ► Both techniques achieve over 70% of sugar recovery, but IL pretreatment requires less enzyme loading and faster hydrolysis.
