| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 690309 | Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers | 2016 | 6 Pages |
•Orange G adsorption was monolayer on AAER and multilayer on SAER.•Other interactions besides ion exchange contributed to orange G adsorption on SAER.•AAER exhibited faster kinetics with lower t1/2 and larger h0 values than SAER.•Regeneration of AAER was better than SAER with no capacity reduction during reuse.•The effect of solution pH on the adsorption of AAER was slighter than that of SAER.
Two ion-exchange resins with similar properties, namely, polystyrene anion-exchange resin SAER and polyacrylic anion-exchange resin AAER, were applied for orange G removal to investigate the effect of polymeric structure on adsorption. Despite having similar adsorption capacities, AAER exhibited an initial reaction rate that was 2.0–4.4 times greater than that of SAER. Moreover, the adsorption isotherm on AAER followed the Langmuir equation, whereas the adsorption on SAER was better described by the Freundlich equation. AAER adsorption was dominated by ion exchange, as indicated by the ratio of released Cl− to adsorbed orange G, which was 1.10. By contrast, this ratio was 0.754 in SAER, indicating that other interactions aside from ion exchange were involved in the adsorption of SAER, such as hydrophobic and π–π interactions. AAER showed higher regeneration efficiency than SAER using NaCl solution as the desorption agent. These results demonstrated that AAER was a more suitable adsorbent for orange G removal.
Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide
