Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6975202 | Safety Science | 2017 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
There appears to be consensus that merely promoting traditional safety management or accident prevention will not lead to significant new improvements in safety. Six innovative perspectives associated with ZAV are identified and presented in this paper, which together offer a range of possibilities for both industry and for the safety science community to develop new practices and knowledge that may provide significant improvements in safety. The call for more empirical research into this challenging area is relevant for the advocates of ZAV as well as for its critics.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Chemical Health and Safety
Authors
Gerard I.J.M. Zwetsloot, Pete Kines, Jean-Luc Wybo, Riikka Ruotsala, Linda Drupsteen, Robert A. Bezemer,