Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
7060084 International Journal of Multiphase Flow 2018 35 Pages PDF
Abstract
The framework implemented in TransAT© does not solve for the gas number density and assumes a fixed radius for the bubbles. In the first step the implementation is verified with the help of the one-dimensional model. In the next step, the implementation is tested against the selected test cases from the TOPFLOW database for different types of bubbly flow namely the wall-peaked, the transition and the central-peaked. The simulation results are able to predict the overall behavior of the different types of bubbly flow. The radial gas velocity profiles for all the test cases showed a good match with the experimental data. Unrealistic accumulation of small bubbles close to the walls is observed for the wall-peaked test cases. The results showed that the unrealistic behaviour could be removed tuning the wall lubrication force model. The results highlight the inadequacy of the current wall lubrication force models and show that the wall lubrication force should depend on the velocity of the continuous phase probably in an analogous way to the lift force.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
Authors
, ,