Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7063095 | Biomass and Bioenergy | 2017 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
An analysis of the data highlights that forward speed was greater for the prototype (2.0 km hâ1) when compared to the Rotor planter (1.0 km hâ1) but that no difference was found between the two methods in terms of quality with good rooting results (higher than 97.7%). The hourly fuel consumption determined during the tests was approximately of 7 L per hour for both planters. Differences in specific fuel consumption were, in this case, higher for the Rotor planter (548 g kWh) and lower for the Disafa prototype (507 g kWh). The Disafa prototype showed good performance compared to standard planters both in terms of field capacity, working quality, and fuel consumption. The use of this planter also allows for a reduction in the working time needed for the preparation of cuttings.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Process Chemistry and Technology
Authors
Marco Manzone, Sara Bergante, Gianni Facciotto, Paolo Balsari,