Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7063201 | Biomass and Bioenergy | 2016 | 24 Pages |
Abstract
At the farm gate, crop residues cost between 0.9 and 1.7 $ GJâ1. About 96% of these residues are available below 1.5 $ GJâ1. In the improved scenario, up to 85% of the biomass is below 1.3 $ GJâ1. For biomass deliveries at the conversion plant, about 36% is below 5 $ GJâ1 while in the optimised scenario, about 87% is delivered below 5$ GJâ1. Co-firing residues with coal results in lower cost of electricity compared to other renewables and significant GHG (CO2 eq) emissions reduction (up to 0.72 tons MWhâ1). Establishing sustainable crop residue supply systems in South Africa could start by utilising the existing agricultural infrastructure to secure supply and develop a functional market. It would then be necessary to incentivise improvements across the value chain.
Keywords
OECDTOPSCTPRPRCGPIPCCIEAN2ONH3GHGLDCResidue to product ratioO&MBaUNOxSOMAmmoniaInternational energy agencyLCANitrous oxideNitrogen oxidesAgricultural residuesLife-cycle analysisImagePower productionCarbon dioxideSupply chainBioenergyFood and Agriculture Organisation of the United NationsOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentSOCoperation and maintenanceFAOLogisticsSoil organic matterNitrogenIntergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeCarbonSoil organic carbonCO2European CommissionGreenhouse gasTorrefied pellets
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Process Chemistry and Technology
Authors
B. Batidzirai, M. Valk, B. Wicke, M. Junginger, V. Daioglou, W. Euler, A.P.C. Faaij,