| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7113415 | The Electricity Journal | 2018 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
This paper provides further arguments why Jacobson and Delucchi's (JD) critiques of my paper are misplaced. It also provides additional references to work that reached different conclusions than Jacobson et al. Work by JD and others is useful in identifying the plethora of assumptions required to conclude that intermittent renewables can now be economically substituted for all current uses of fossil fuels throughout the entire economy.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Authors
Robert J. Procter,