Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7176021 | Journal of Fluids and Structures | 2015 | 16 Pages |
Abstract
Contributions were received from five different groups using a range of methods, from fully resolved Reynolds averaged Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) models to Large Eddy Simulations (LES). The range of results was large but the overall trend is that the current methods predict the power generation as well as the thrust force reasonably well. But there is a large uncertainty in the prediction of the turbulence field in the wake. Hence, the LES method consistently performed better than the others.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Authors
Per-Ã
ge Krogstad, Lars Sætran, Muyiwa Samuel Adaramola,