Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7236677 | Journal of Biomechanics | 2018 | 27 Pages |
Abstract
A phantom study was conducted to determine bias in motion and bias at zero motion of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for evaluating implant relative displacement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). A Sawbones shoulder phantom was fitted with a RTSA implant set and 13 tantalum markers. The model was fixed to a manual micrometer, providing controlled movements though fifteen known increments in translation and twelve increments in rotation (0.02-5.00â¯mm and 0.1-6.0°), along each translation and rotation axis. Movement between the glenoid and humerus was assessed using beads vs. beads (B/B), model vs. beads (M/B), and model vs. model (M/M) measurement methods in a model-based RSA environment. Bias in motion and bias at zero motion were defined as the difference between measured and accepted reference values, and the difference between double examinations with a theoretical displacement of zero, respectively. Bias in motion ranged from 0.054â¯Â±â¯0.010 to 0.129â¯Â±â¯0.014â¯mm and 0.076â¯Â±â¯0.025 to 0.126â¯Â±â¯0.025° (B/B), 0.023â¯Â±â¯0.009 to 0.126â¯Â±â¯0.016â¯mm and 0.111â¯Â±â¯0.033 to 0.794â¯Â±â¯0.251° (M/B), and 0.029â¯Â±â¯0.010 to 0.135â¯Â±â¯0.030â¯mm and 0.243â¯Â±â¯0.088 to 0.384â¯Â±â¯0.153° (M/M). Bias at zero motion ranged from 0.120 to 0.156â¯mm and 0.075 to 0.206° (B/B), 0.074 to 0.149â¯mm and 0.067 to 1.953° (M/B), and 0.069 to 0.259â¯mm and 0.284 to 1.273° (M/M). This is the first RSA for RTSA study, with results comparable to those validating the use of RSA for hip and knee arthroplasties (accepted as 0.05-0.50â¯mm and 0.15-1.15°), justifying the potential use of RSA as a tool for measuring implant displacement in the shoulder.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Biomedical Engineering
Authors
Madeleine L. Van de Kleut, Xunhua Yuan, George S. Athwal, Matthew G. Teeter,