| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7294320 | Intelligence | 2014 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
A critical commentary of Armstrong et al. (2014) is presented. It is concluded that their article's argument (that the Skolt IQ is broadly in line with Cold Winters theory) is stronger than they give it credit for when other research on the Skolt is taken into account. They can also be more confident than they are in their conclusions with regard to the estimated Sami IQ.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Psychology
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Authors
Edward Dutton,