Evaluating the cancellability test

This paper considers four lines of objection to the efficacy or worth of Grice's cancellability test for conversational implicatures - the coherence objection, the entailment objection, the sarcasm objection, and the ambiguity objection. I argue that the test survives these objections relatively unscathed; and hence conclude that the cancellability test is still a significant, useful, reliable indicator at the semantics/pragmatics interface.