Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7328889 | Social Science & Medicine | 2017 | 24 Pages |
Abstract
We identified two common practices in SMIs that can reduce well-being and widen well-being inequalities; namely, the promotion of conspicuous consumption and assaults on dignity, and we discuss the mechanisms by which such impacts occur. We recommend that ESAs understand sanitation marketing's potential to reduce well-being and design SMIs to minimize such detrimental impacts. Throughout the implementation phase ESAs should continuously monitor for well-being impacts and adapt practices to optimise well-being outcomes for all involved.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
D.J. Barrington, S. Sridharan, K.F. Shields, S.G. Saunders, R.T. Souter, J. Bartram,