Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7329702 | Social Science & Medicine | 2016 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
This article uses national survey data, combined with the results of a community consultation that took place in Tasmania, Australia in 2013, to analyze the specific issue of public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and their outputs. This research will enhance the ability of biobanks to respond preemptively to public concerns about commercialization by establishing and maintaining governance frameworks that are responsive to those concerns. The results reveal that it is possible to counter the 'natural prejudice' that many people have against commercialization through independent governance of biobank resources and transparency with regard to commercial involvement. Indeed, most participants agreed that they would rather have a biobank with commercial involvement than none at all. This analysis provides nuanced conclusions about public reactions towards commercialization and equips researchers and biobank operators with data on which to base policies and make governance decisions in order to tackle participant concerns respectfully and responsively.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Dianne Nicol, Christine Critchley, Rebekah McWhirter, Tess Whitton,