Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7329743 | Social Science & Medicine | 2016 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Public Involvement (PI) is a strategic priority in global healthcare settings, yet can be seen as peripheral during decision making processes. Whilst extant research acknowledges variations in how policy is translated into practice, the majority attribute it to the limiting influence of professional hierarchies on the perceived 'legitimacy' of PI. Drawing on examples of three commissioning organisations within the English NHS, we outline how the variance in policy implementation for PI can be attributed to influence from the managers rather than professionals. In doing so we explore how rational ideologies of managerial control negatively impact PI. However, we also illustrate how PI alluded to in policy can be more successfully realised when organisational managers enact normative ideologies of control. Notwithstanding this assertion, we argue managerial domination exists even in the case of normative ideologies of control, to the detriment of more radical PI in service development.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Charlotte Croft, Graeme Currie, Sophie Staniszewska,