Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7346767 | Economic Modelling | 2018 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
The desirability of a nominal-level target during zero lower bound (ZLB) episodes has become a relevant topic for central bankers and academics. In such a context, this article studies the effects of uncertainty about the future state of the economy on the performance of strict-price-level targeting versus nominal-GDP-level targeting. These targeting frameworks are compared in a small New Keynesian model, which offers a clear illustration of the tradeoffs faced by the central bank. The analysis shows that uncertainty about the future hampers economic performance to a greater extent under nominal-GDP-level targeting, relative to strict-price-level targeting. The reason is that strict-price-level targeting induces greater policy inertia and, therefore, improves the tradeoffs faced by the central bank during ZLB episodes.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Roberto M. Billi,