Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7370177 | Journal of Public Economics | 2014 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
This paper studies the relationship between a financially constrained firm and a stronger opponent who is not cash-constrained when these firms repeatedly compete in a procurement context. We characterize and discuss the procurement agency's optimal strategy when faced with such asymmetric firms. We highlight a trade-off between the long-run benefits from competition and the short-run benefits from reduced costs. Finally, we show that to reduce costs in the short run, the financially weak firm should be favored in future procurement.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Authors
Malin Arve,