Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7441666 | Journal of Archaeological Science | 2015 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
Two new but similar approaches to California mussel (Mytilus californianus) size prediction using archaeological fragments, are compared with known mussel biology. Some assumptions, traditional in zooarchaeology but unfounded zoologically, have made prediction formulae that are likely to be generally inaccurate. A standard statistical exploratory technique shows archaeologically informative underlying structure in the data.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Materials Science
Materials Science (General)
Authors
Greg Campbell,