Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
7441666 Journal of Archaeological Science 2015 13 Pages PDF
Abstract
Two new but similar approaches to California mussel (Mytilus californianus) size prediction using archaeological fragments, are compared with known mussel biology. Some assumptions, traditional in zooarchaeology but unfounded zoologically, have made prediction formulae that are likely to be generally inaccurate. A standard statistical exploratory technique shows archaeologically informative underlying structure in the data.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Materials Science Materials Science (General)
Authors
,