Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7464514 | Electoral Studies | 2014 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
Voter assessments of party competence have become a key explanation of electoral decision-making. However, there are at least three important aspects to understanding responses to questions on issue-specific party competence: comprehension difficulties; a lack of well-formed attitudes and relevant information; and the use of response heuristics. We used 20 cognitive interviews carried out in Austria in 2011 to test competence questions. The interviews show us how respondents explain their responses. We find evidence that many people (1) may hold only weak opinions and have little information on issue-specific party competence and (2) may make use of distinct but related concepts, particularly salience and position, when answering questions about competence. We provide recommendations for researchers and survey designers based on our findings.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Social Sciences
Geography, Planning and Development
Authors
Markus Wagner, Eva Zeglovits,