Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7498924 | Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment | 2018 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Drivers get involved easily in Left-Turn Across Path with Opposite Direction Traffic (LTAP-OD) conflicts at signalized intersection with unprotected left-turn phasing. This study classified the left-turn drivers' performance into four types: (1) the correct acceptance of safe lags/gaps, (2) the correct rejection of dangerous lags/gaps, (3) the false rejection of safe lags/gaps and (4) the false acceptance of dangerous lags/gaps. Based on the high mounted video camera data, the logistic regression model was used to obtain the critical gaps for estimating whether the lags/gaps were safe or not. The results show that the cognition behavior of the left-turn drivers should be improved while the gap/lag is drawn near the critical gap. Furthermore, the conservative drivers are more likely to reject the larger lags/gaps and yield the right-of-way to the opposing vehicles. Simultaneously the poor response execution may cause drivers to have difficulties during the turning performance when the lags/gaps are large enough. These results could be used as the basis for a discussion of the right time to support the drivers.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Environmental Science
Environmental Science (General)
Authors
Yan Mao, Wuhong Wang, Chenxi Ding, Weiwei Guo, Xiaobei Jiang, Martin Baumann, Geert Wets,