Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7500010 | Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment | 2015 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Results show that for the same reductions in tail-pipe GHG emissions, pro-technology, pro-simplicity, and the mix scenario offer 22%, 29% and 28% reduction in the life cycle GHG emissions respectively, compared to the reference scenario in year 2020. However, the pro-simplicity scenario requires 25% reduction in vehicle-km driven compared to the pro-technology scenario, which provides the same passenger car mobility as in the reference case. When the GHG intensity of the electricity mix used to power EVs is corrected to account for actual consumption mix in Norway, a 13% reduction in the net GHG benefit of pro-technology scenario is observed.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Environmental Science
Environmental Science (General)
Authors
Bhawna Singh, Linda Ager-Wick Ellingsen, Anders Hammer Strømman,