Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7532618 | Discourse, Context & Media | 2018 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
While research into crowdfunding in general has been steadily increasing, few studies have looked at how requests are formulated on personal fundraising sites. Through a narrative analysis of 105 medical campaigns on GoFundMe (GFM), we examine the way people appeal to the lived experiences and moral assumptions of members of their own social network in order to request funding. While requests are deeply embedded in the suggested scaffold of the GoFundMe platform, authors depart in codified ways from the strategies recommended by the site. These vernacular departures serve to position people in dire need of assistance as respectable and worthy of help. We argue such self-positioning distracts from the injustices of a free-market medical system that depletes people's resources and renders them precarious subjects at the mercy of donations from individuals in the same socio-economic boat.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
Language and Linguistics
Authors
Trena M. Paulus, Katherine R. Roberts,