Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7551584 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A | 2018 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Bogen and Woodward's distinction between data and phenomena raises the need to understand the structure of the data-to-phenomena and theory-to-phenomena inferences. I suggest that one way to study the structure of these inferences is to analyze the role of the assumptions involved in the inferences: What kind of assumptions are they? How do these assumptions contribute to the practice of identifying phenomena? In this paper, using examples from atmospheric dynamics, I develop an account of the practice of identifying the target in the data-to-phenomena and theory-to-phenomena inferences in which assumptions about spatiotemporal scales play a central role in the identification of parameters that describe the target system. I also argue that these assumptions are not only empirical but they are also idealizing and abstracting. I conclude the paper with a reflection on the role of idealizations in modeling.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
History
Authors
Marina Baldissera Pacchetti,