Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7551642 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A | 2016 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Feminist standpoint empiricism contributes to the criticism of the value-free ideal by offering a unique analysis of how non-epistemic values can play not only a legitimate but also an epistemically productive role in science. While the inductive risk argument focuses on the role of non-epistemic values in the acceptance of hypotheses, standpoint empiricism focuses on the role of non-epistemic values in the production of evidence. And while many other analyses of values in science focus on the role of non-epistemic values either in an individual scientist's decision making or in the distribution of research efforts in scientific communities, standpoint empiricism focuses on the role of non-epistemic values in the building of scientific/intellectual movements.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
History
Authors
Kristina Rolin,