Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7551689 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A | 2014 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
This paper discusses a crisis of accountability that arises when scientific collaborations are massively epistemically distributed. We argue that social models of epistemic collaboration, which are social analogs to what Patrick Suppes called a “model of the experiment,” must play a role in creating accountability in these contexts. We also argue that these social models must accommodate the fact that the various agents in a collaborative project often have ineliminable, messy, and conflicting interests and values; any story about accountability in a massively distributed collaboration must therefore involve models of such interests and values and their methodological and epistemic effects.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
History
Authors
Eric Winsberg, Bryce Huebner, Rebecca Kukla,