Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7588538 | Food Chemistry | 2016 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Several factors affect virgin olive oil (VOO) phenolic profile. The aim of this study was to monitor olive hydrolytic (β-glucosidase) and oxidative (peroxydase, POX, and polyphenoloxydase, PPO) enzymes during olive ripening and storage and to determine their capacity to shape VOO phenolic profile. To this end, olives from the cultivars Chétoui and Arbequina were stored at 4 °C or 25 °C for 4 weeks and their enzymatic activities and oil phenolic profiles were compared to those of ripening olives. We observed different trends in enzymes activities according to cultivar and storage temperature. Secoiridoid compounds, determined by high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), and their deacetoxylated, oxygenated, and deacetoxy-oxygenated derivatives were identified and their contents differed between the cultivars according to olive ripening degree and storage conditions. These differences could be due to β-glucosidase, POX and PPO activities changes during olive ripening and storage. Results also show that oxidised phenolic compounds could be a marker of VOO ''freshness”.
Keywords
3,4-DHPEA-EApNPGguaiacol (PubChem CID: 460)PMSFWAFPPODithiothreitol (PubChem CID: 446094)p-HPEA-EDA3,4-DHPEA-EDADTTp-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranosideTBCSDSPOXoleuropein aglyconeEndogenous enzymesEDTAethylene diamine tetraacetic aciddithiothreitolvirgin olive oilSodium dodecyl sulfate (PubChem CID: 3423265)sodium dodecyl sulfateHigh resolution mass spectrometryphenyl methyl sulfonyl fluorideweeks after floweringPeroxidaseVOOPolyphenoloxidase
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry
Authors
Rim Hachicha Hbaieb, Faten Kotti, Nuria Cortes-Francisco, Josep Caixach, Mohamed Gargouri, Stefania Vichi,