| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 758859 | Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation | 2012 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The aim of this letter is to confirm the achievements in [1] and answer all the mentioned comments in [2]. Meanwhile some other drawbacks in the comment paper [2] are also presented in this paper.
► This paper is a response to the comment by Mr. M.P. Aghababa. Some ideas are proposed to rebut the comments. ► We show that some properties for the Riemann–Liouville definition and for the Caputo definition are different. ► Some drawbacks in the comment paper are also presented here in this paper.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Authors
Hadi Delavari, Reza Ghaderi, Abolfazl Ranjbar, Shaher Momani,