Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7631482 | Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis | 2013 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
In order to assure an efficient and sustainable transfer of analytical procedures, a practically relevant and scientifically sound evaluation with corresponding acceptance criteria is crucial. Various strategies and statistical tools such as significance tests, absolute acceptance criteria, and equivalence tests are thoroughly descibed and compared in detail giving examples. Significance tests should be avoided. The success criterion is not statistical significance, but rather analytical relevance. Depending on a risk assessment of the analytical procedure in question, statistical equivalence tests are recommended, because they include both, a practically relevant acceptance limit and a direct control of the statistical risks. However, for lower risk procedures, a simple comparison of the transfer performance parameters to absolute limits is also regarded as sufficient.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry
Authors
J. Ermer, M. Limberger, K. Lis, H. Wätzig,