Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
782562 | International Journal of Mechanical Sciences | 2012 | 12 Pages |
X-ray diffraction combined with electropolishing layer removal is a major technique for subsurface residual stress measurement. The layer removal steps inevitably change the stress fields within the remaining material and thus the stress measurements must be corrected. In this paper, an existing FE-based methodology is improved and compared with the Moore and Evans correction. Stress relaxation caused by different layer removal methods is calculated numerically and the applicability of the proposed correction method is discussed. The results indicate that although the FE-based correction method also has some limitations, it is more versatile and accurate than the Moore and Evans correction.
► An existing FE-based layer removal correction method was improved. ► The FE method gives the same results as Moore and Evans correction for a long tube. ► The stress relaxation caused by four layer removal geometries was compared. ► The proposed FE method works well in cases for which Moore and Evans fails. ► Errors arise in the corrections obtained by FE when the assumptions of the method are not rigorously respected.