Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7866398 | Materials Science and Engineering: C | 2018 | 26 Pages |
Abstract
Different cell morphologies between titanium and hydroxyapatite surfaces were exhibited. At 1â¯day of cell culture, cells on the titanium coating were spread and flattened, expanding the filopodia actin filaments in all directions, while cells on the hydroxyapatite coatings showed round like-shape morphology due to slower attachment. Higher cell viability was detected at all times of cell culture on titanium coating due to a better attachment at 1â¯day. However, from 7â¯days of cell culture, cells on hydroxyapatite showed good attachment onto surfaces and highly increased their proliferation, mostly on nanocrystalline, achieving similar cell viability levels than titanium coatings. ALP levels were significantly higher in titanium, in part, because of greatest cell number. Overall, the best cell functional results were obtained on titanium coatings whereas microcrystalline hydroxyapatite presented the worst cellular parameters. However, results indicate that nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite coatings may achieve promising results for the faster cell proliferation once cells are attached on the surface.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Materials Science
Biomaterials
Authors
A.M. Vilardell, N. Cinca, N. Garcia-Giralt, S. Dosta, I.G. Cano, X. Nogués, J.M. Guilemany,