Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7935372 | Solar Energy | 2018 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The strong influence of salt cost and hot-tank cost on overall economics led to the analysis of single-tank thermocline options. The thermocline design significantly reduces salt inventory (by 50% or more) and in many cases also reduces the tank size versus the hot salt tank of the 2-tank system. It is speculated that integration of encapsulated phase-change material (PCM) in the thermocline could further increase the thermal-storage energy density and reduce storage tank volume. The thermocline cases led to three scenarios with relative LCOE reductions of approximately 10%; however, this must be tempered by possible operational inefficiencies of the thermocline temperature profile.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Authors
Craig S. Turchi, Judith Vidal, Matthew Bauer,