Bridge aerodynamics and aeroelasticity: A comparison of modeling schemes

•A comparison of models to assess the aerodynamic (buffeting) and aeroelastic (motion-induced) behavior of bridges is presented.•Fluid memory and nonlinear effects are critical to the behavior of a bridge under winds.•Coupled effects between the aerodynamic and aeroelastic effects reduce the aerodynamic response.•Incident turbulence impacts the flutter speed differently for models that emphasize nonlinear or memory effects.•The modified hybrid model introduced herein captures critical features of wind–bridge deck interactions.

Accurate modeling of wind-induced loads on bridge decks is critical to ensure the functionality and survivability of long-span bridges. Over the last few decades, several schemes have emerged to model bridge behavior under winds from an aerodynamic/aeroelastic perspective. A majority of these schemes rely on the quasi-steady (QS) theory. This paper systematically compares and assesses the efficacy of five analytical models available in the literature with a new model presented herein. These models include: QS theory-based model, corrected QS theory-based model, linearized QS theory-based model, semi-empirical linear model, hybrid model, and the proposed modified hybrid model. The ability of these models to capture fluid memory and nonlinear effects either individually or collectively is examined. In addition, their ability to include the effects of turbulence in the approach flow on the bridge behavior is assessed. All models are compared in a consistent manner by utilizing the time domain approach. The underlying role of each model in capturing the physics of bridge behavior under winds is highlighted and the influence of incoming turbulence and its interaction with the bridge deck is examined. A discussion is included that focuses on a number of critical parameters pivotal to the effectiveness of corresponding models.