Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
797084 Journal of Fluids and Structures 2012 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

This paper presents a comparative investigation between numerical flow simulations and the experimental data of a vibrating cantilever. The unsteady flow fields were observed with smoke visualization, and the unsteady velocities were measured by high-resolution PIV (particle image velocimetry). Although the experimental results provide an intuitive understanding about the vortex formation from the vibrating cantilever, it is difficult to determine the underlying mechanism of vortex generation due to the limitation of temporal and spatial resolution. Numerical simulations were conducted using commercial code with a user-defined function describing the cantilever movement. The comparison between the experiment and simulation mainly covers velocity fields, vorticity distributions and the vortex location as well as the vortex size during one cycle. Qualitatively, velocity and vorticity distributions match well between the experiment and the simulation. The size and axial location (with respect to the cantilever tip) of the vortices are also in good agreement with the experimental data. Once validated, numerical simulations provide access to the whole flow field including pressure data. The flow has been evaluated in detail to understand vortex generation at the cantilever. It was found that the static pressure difference across the tip plays an important role in the formation and development of each individual vortex. In addition, it was possible to find the exact moment of vortex initiation using the static pressure difference across the cantilever tip.

► Flow simulation on the vortex formation by a vibrating cantilever. ► Comparison and validation of numerical results to experimental data. ► Four steps in vortex formation: initiation, development, separation and propagation. ► Static pressure difference across the tip plays a key role in the vortex formation. ► The exact moment for vortex initiation can be found using static pressure difference.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Engineering Mechanical Engineering
Authors
, , ,