Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8028652 | Surface and Coatings Technology | 2013 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
By comparing both model results the validity of the fluid model was checked. Although in both models a Maxwell-Boltzmann energy distribution of the neutral particles is the natural outcome, the results of the gas flow differ significantly. The fluid model description breaks down, due to the inappropriate assumption of a fluid continuum. This is due to exclusion of non-local effects in the multi dimensional velocity space, as well as invalid gas/wall interactions. Only the kinetic model is able to provide an accurate physical description of the gas flow in the transition regime. Our analysis is completed with a brief investigation of different definitions of the local Knudsen number. We conclude that the most decisive parameter - the spatial length scale L - has to be very careful chosen in order to obtain a reasonable estimate of the gas flow regime.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Materials Science
Nanotechnology
Authors
Kirsten Bobzin, Ralf Peter Brinkmann, Thomas Mussenbrock, Nazlim Bagcivan, Ricardo Henrique Brugnara, Marcel Schäfer, Jan Trieschmann,