Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
803084 Mechanism and Machine Theory 2013 20 Pages PDF
Abstract

In optimal motion planning and control, the complex time-varying nature of redundant robots, environments, and task requirements causes complex domains and conflicting constraints. Since predicting or recovering infeasibility is not always possible, infeasibilities occur frequently and are not completely avoidable. We introduce a constrained nonlinear programming framework of controlled (as opposed to recovered) infeasibility for physically valid solutions while preserving the original problem and variable space. The constraint prioritization hierarchy includes a comprehensive classification of physical consistency, design requirements, and tasks. Priority weight functions having features of normalization and prioritization are incorporated into a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) algorithm to ensure generality and strict satisfaction of high-priority constraints, while lower-priority constraint violations are minimized. These are embedded in SQP through its merit function and composite cost function, in which general nonlinear functions including unilateral, time-dependent, and nonholonomic, can be incorporated in a unified approach. Also, the avoidance of the discontinuity problem with unilateral constraints is due to the time-dependent constraints strategy, which actively adapts to varying states. Numerical examples using multibody dynamic models of a redundant manipulator demonstrate these advantages.

► Infeasibility from conflicting constraints is controlled for physical consistency. ► Original problem and variable space are preserved; no need to recover infeasibility. ► General cost and constraint functions are incorporated in a unified approach in SQP. ► Time-dependent constraint strategy adapts to unilateral constraints' varying states. ► Priority levels are based on physical consistency, design requirements, and tasks.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Engineering Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Authors
, ,