Optimal inspection strategy planning for geometric tolerance verification

•A model for the choice of an optimal inspection strategy is proposed.•The model minimizes simultaneously measurement cost and inspection errors (uncertainty) costs.•Two uncertainty evaluation methods are introduced, supporting the model.•Few case studies are reviewed, including roundness and parallelism inspection.

Two features characterize a good inspection system: it is accurate, and compared to the manufacturing cost, it is not expensive. Unfortunately, few measuring systems posses both these characteristics, i.e. low uncertainty comes with a cost. But also high uncertainty comes with a cost, because measuring systems with high uncertainty tend to generate more inspection errors, which come with a cost.In the case of geometric inspection, the geometric deviation is evaluated from a cloud of points sampled on a part. Therefore, not only the measuring device has to be selected, but also the sampling strategy has to be planned, i.e. the sampling point cloud size and where points should be located on the feature to inspect have to be decided. When the measuring device is already available, as it often happens in geometric measurement, where most instruments are flexible, an unwise strategy planning can be the largest uncertainty contributor.In this work, a model for the evaluation of the overall inspection cost is proposed. The optimization of the model can lead to an optimal inspection strategy in economic sense. However, the model itself is based on uncertainty evaluation, in order to assess the impact of measurement error on inspection cost. Therefore, two methodologies for evaluating the uncertainty will be proposed. These methodologies will be focused on the evaluation of the contribution of the sampling strategy to the uncertainty. Finally, few case studies dealing with the inspection planning for a Coordinate Measuring Machine will be proposed.